Are you looking for a good pair of True Wireless earbuds that you can use confidently in the gym? If so, you may want to look at the Sony WF-SP800N.
Sony is always a great company when it comes to audio products. In fact, their newly released Sony WH-1000XM4 is touted as the best wireless headphones in 2020.
Well, the Sony WF-SP800N is actually a pair of wireless earbuds and they are meant for active people. Its IP55 rating ensures that these things can withstand dust, sweat, and rain without any issues.
Today, I am going to be reviewing these and, I will be stating my honest opinion at the end.
The Sony WF-SP800N borrows the same design elements from Sony’s other TWS earbuds- the Sony WF-1000XM3, with the exception of the ear fins that are on these things.
The silicone ear tips, as well as the aforementioned ear fins, can help provide a more secure fit. You just have to make sure that you are fitting it with the right one for you as people’s ears are different.
Anyway, it does have a little bit of heft to it but I like that it gives you this sense of confidence that these won’t break down on you even with rigorous use.
On the outer exterior, you will find a glossy surface on each earbud. That particular spot is where you will tap your finger to initiate some controls.
For example, tapping your finger once on the left earbud will activate its noise-canceling feature while tapping on the right would play/pause your music tracks. You can learn more about the gesture controls by downloading the Sony Headphones Connect app.
One of the criticisms with Sony’s TWS earbuds is that they usually come in a really chunky case and that is true with the Sony WF-SP800N.
The charging case is a bit bigger compared to the Google Pixel Earbuds or even the Samsung Galaxy Buds Plus which means that if you intend to place it in your pocket, you will not be able to put anything else on that particular pocket because it takes up quite a lot of space. It is also worth mentioning that there will be a noticeable bulge in the pocket where you put the case in.
Unlike the Apple Airpods Pro, the Sony WF-1000XM3 connects via old-fashioned Bluetooth. When you first remove these things from the case, it will immediately start blinking blue- indicating that it is currently in pairing mode.
You then take out your mobile device- may it be a phone or a tablet, and then turn on its Bluetooth functionality. You should then be able to see the earbuds almost instantly.
Now, I do have to point out that if you intend to pair these things on your other devices, the process is a bit different. That is because once it is paired to one device, you will have to initiate a sequence where it will go to pairing mode again.
To do that, you will place a finger on the glossy surface for roughly 7 seconds and you will hear a voice prompt that tells you that it is in the said mode. Then, all you have to do is turn on the Bluetooth functionality of your other devices and you are good to go.
I have received reports that some users have trouble with stuttering when playing something with these on your ears. If that is the case, there is a ‘Stable Connection’ option in the earbuds’ app that you can enable to help fix this issue.
To get a hold of the Sony WF-SP800N’s features, you must first download the Sony Headphones Connect App. After firing it up for the first time, you will be prompted to download a firmware update and you should do that immediately.
Anyway, the Sony WF-SP800N has active noise-canceling which is good. It is not as good as the Apple Airpods Pro though but I still like that Sony included it in these.
Aside from that, you also get a transparency mode that is the complete opposite of active noise-canceling. Enabling this feature will let external noise in so you do not have to take them off if someone is trying to talk to you, for instance.
As is customary with Sony’s wireless products, you also have the ability to use the LDAC codec. This particular codec can transfer huge amounts of audio data from your phone/tablet to the earbuds, thus giving you better overall sound quality.
The only problem with the said codec is that your phone must support it, so iPhone users, you are out of luck since the platform only supports AAC. AAC is, by no means, a bad audio codec, but it certainly cannot compete with LDAC.
Lastly, I love that the Sony WF-SP800N can support Sony’s 360 Reality Audio feature. This is still a relatively new technology but what it basically does is that it uses your phone to take pictures of your left and right ears.
After that, the application would then create a custom sound profile that is tailored to your ears for better positional audio and listening experience.
While you might think this is gimmicky, I am surprised that it actually works! Of course, you will need a compatible audio file for this to work, but the good news is that support for this feature grows immensely over time.
Because the Sony WF-SP800N is touted to be a great gym companion, they offer more bass than other TWS earbuds out there. This can be a good or bad thing depending on the genre of music you want to listen to.
If you listen to bass-heavy tracks, using these things is a dream because it can really support the low frequencies with aplomb. However, you will notice that the upper mids-highs will get a bit drowned out, but not by much.
Of course, you can tinker with the EQ settings in the Headphones Connect app so you can somehow tell it to favor the mid and high frequencies. But, they are inherently meant to produce more bass from the get-go, so you wouldn’t get too far in terms of audio quality.
Don’t get me wrong, the Sony WF-SP800N does sound amazing, it is just that I wouldn’t recommend this for people that usually listen to pop or acoustic songs.
To be honest, I am quite surprised with the microphone quality of the Sony WF-SP800N. I am able to talk to my buddies on the other end of the line without any issues, even if I am outside with all of the external noise possible.
It has got to do with the noise-canceling microphones that are built into these earbuds, so I would give Sony some props for including them in.
The Sony WF-SP800N is one of the best in terms of battery life. I was able to squeeze 9 hours of playback time at 75% volume and with ANC enabled (because you know, you want to concentrate on yourself when you are working out). Disabling the ANC resulted in 13 hours of playback time which is pretty insane.
My only issue with the SP800N’s battery life is that its case can only hold so much energy for one full charge. So, if you completely drain the battery on these earbuds, you will only get one complete charge cycle when placing them back in the case.
But, if you are okay with the amazing battery life that the earbuds have, then the charging case problem will not be a big deal.
When you want a great pair of TWS earbuds for working out, the Sony WF-SP800N is a solid option. I would say that the Jabra Elite Active 75t is better in terms of overall audio quality, but if you are listening to bass-heavy songs anyway, then these earbuds will surely be a treat.
Microphone quality is also quite good. You will be heard intelligibly on the other end of the line thanks to the noise-canceling microphones on these things.
The Sony WF-SP800N is also a survivor in the battery department as these things can last over 9 hours with active noise-canceling enabled.
If you want a good pair of TWS earbuds for working out, the Sony WF-SP800N is a good choice. The earbuds are priced at $200.
Google Nest Audio vs Amazon Echo- The Battle of the New ‘Smart’ Speakers
Smart home speakers are not as popular as mobile phones, but in my opinion, it actually should be.
You see, companies are slowly rolling out smart home devices so that your life will be so much easier given the convenience of having them.
That being said, I am going to be talking about the Google Nest Audio and Amazon Echo speakers because they are the ones that are at the forefront when it comes to smart home speakers. Which of these should you choose? Read on to find out!
For those of you who do not know, Google Nest Audio is actually the Google Home speakers that were released just about a year ago. It seems that Google wanted to use a new moniker to denote that this particular thing can ‘nest’ your other smart home devices.
The Amazon Echo, on the other hand, refers to the medium-sized Bluetooth speaker that the largest online retailer sells. The company is set to release a new version of this device soon, so it would be interesting to see how well it performs.
Even though the new version of the Amazon Echo hasn’t arrived at our doorstep yet for an official review, this is not to say that we can somehow speculate what it can offer, especially considering that the company has provided us with some really good information about it.
With all of those out of the way, let’s talk more about the design first. The Google Nest Audio takes on a more cylindrical approach in that the speaker itself has a higher height than the Amazon Echo.
For that reason, you are getting a 75mm woofer and a single 19mm tweeter. Google touts the Google Nest Audio as a better sound solution compared to its original Google Home Speaker because of the changes.
On the other hand, the Amazon Echo, in my opinion, has better sound quality. That is thanks to its two 20mm tweeters and a huge 76.2mm woofer. Its design is more spherical but I am pleased (and surprised) that Amazon was able to include two tweeters on its Bluetooth speaker implementation.
At the base of the Amazon Echo is a blue light ring that changes the way it emits light depending on the current usage.
Both of these Bluetooth speakers are offered in various colors so you have different options to choose from.
If you look at the design of both speakers, you could make a case that the Amazon Echo wins this round when it comes to pure sound quality. Its two tweeters compared to the single tweeter on the Google Nest Audio, provides it with a much better chance of delivering mid-high sound frequencies.
This is not to discount the fact that Google has some tricks up its sleeves because its AI technology is smart enough to adjust the sound quality on the fly when needed.
Both of the speakers have an adaptive sound feature wherein if it detects that the ambient noise is loud enough, it increases the volume of whatever content you are consuming at that moment to compensate. This is using both of the speakers’ microphones. The volume should normalize to the last known level after it detects that the ambient sound has quieted down.
Of course, this is only my opinion after looking at the spec sheet because I will have to get my hands on these things before I can give my honest opinion. But, my initial assessment would be that the Amazon Echo delivers better sound compared to the Google Nest Audio.
To be able to provide you with ‘smart’ features, both the Google Nest Audio and Amazon Echo are equipped with processors that can handle just that.
The Google Nest Audio comes with the company’s TeraOPS A53 processor which is a quad-core chip that boasts of better performance compared to the company’s previous Bluetooth speakers.
On the other hand, Amazon’s own speaker is equipped with the AZ1 Neural Edge processor that, according to the company, should be more responsive to voice commands compared to previous versions.
It is hard to say who wins this round. You see, Amazon has Zigbee hub integration which means that your connected smart home devices have better compatibility with the said speaker because of this.
However, we all know that Google’s AI technology is so advanced (and even more accurate) than Alexa, so it could potentially provide you with better features overall compared to Amazon’s Bluetooth speaker.
Of course, I cannot truly say which one wins this round until I get to review these wireless audio solutions. In that case, stay tuned for more.
The Google Nest Audio will be available on October 5, while the Amazon Echo will not be released until later this month (October 22). That being said, both of these speakers will retail for $99.99, so stay tuned for our official product reviews to help you know which one you should ultimately choose for yourself.
Apple iPad 8th Generation Review- An Iterative Upgrade
When it comes to ease of use and convenience, people like getting Apple’s products because of its more streamlined approach to everything. Sure, there is a lot to tinker on Android but that is also precisely the reason why the user experience, at least for the layman, is not as great.
There is this saying that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Well, although I would have liked to say that here, I just don’t think that that approach applies here.
You see, the design of the 8th generation iPad is identical to its predecessor. As in everything about its aesthetics are similar which means that if you want to imagine what the new iPad looks like, all you have to do is look at the 7th gen variant.
Like all things, it can be a good thing or a bad thing. It is a good thing because that familiar design should feel right at home, especially for people that already own an iPad. It is bad because, in this day and age, more and more mobile devices have slimmer bezels and the new iPad still has those atrociously huge ones.
Don’t get me wrong, there are practical uses to having large bezels as it allows you to hold the tablet better when using it in landscape mode, but if you are watching online content, you can’t help but be bothered by the huge sides.
There are two versions of the 8th generation iPad and that is one with WiFi only and the other one having LTE. Its dimensions are 9.8 x 6.8 x 0.29. The only difference between the WiFi and the LTE versions is that the latter is a bit heavier at 495 grams compared to the 490 grams of the former.
Thankfully, Apple didn’t remove the headphone jack but if you are going to utilize its built-in speakers, you are better off using a good Bluetooth speaker instead.
The 8th generation iPad has a 10.2-inch Retina Display with a resolution of 2160 x 1620 and 264 pixels per inch or PPI. It has a good peak brightness at 500 nits, though you can still experience some problems when you are outside and the sun is shining brightly.
You can utilize the Apple Pencil on this device and it is also quite accurate as well (just keep in mind that it is sold separately).
What I love about iPads, in general, is that their displays provide you with crisp and clear details. Whether you are working on your documents or perhaps watching your favorite movies and TV shows, they do not disappoint.
Specs and Performance
- CPU: A12 Bionic
- GPU: Apple GPU (4-core graphics)
- RAM: 3GB
- Storage: 32GB/128GB
- Display: 10.2-inch Retina IPS LCD Display, 2160 x 1620, 4:3 aspect ratio, 500 nits brightness, 264 PPI
- OS: iPadOS 14
- Cameras: 8-megapixel (back), 1.2-megapixel (front)
- Connectivity: WiFi 802.11 AC, Bluetooth 4.2
- Battery: 32.4 Wh
So, if the 8th generation iPad has an identical design to its predecessor, what has changed here? Well, I am glad you asked. The only notable difference here is that the new model comes with the A12 Bionic chip and that’s pretty much it.
While you could be unhappy with the change, the new CPU actually beats its predecessor by a lot. By using Geekbench 5, single-core scores are about 60% higher than the 7th gen iPad and about 100% better in multi-core tasks than the previous model.
Granted that the said benchmark is relatively old, you couldn’t argue that the new processor is indeed way better than its predecessor.
Even when you are just using the tablet the way it should be used, you can really tell the difference. This is more evident if you are going to play some games.
Now, do not worry about the 3GB of RAM because the iOS ecosystem is quite streamlined and efficient that you normally wouldn’t need more than that.
It should also go without saying that the included cameras are just there for show and they do not really do anything special, so I don’t think that covering them is warranted here.
Sure, the new 8th generation iPad doesn’t bring a lot to the table, but its new processor is leaps and bounds better than its predecessor. Does that justify buying the new one? Probably not, especially if you already own the 7th generation model.
However, if you own an older iPad and you want better performance across the board, then you could probably spend your money to get one.
My gripe here is that there are only two storage options to choose from. You can get the 32GB variant for only $329 but in this day and age, 32GB is not a lot of storage space.
If you want more storage, you will need to spend an additional $100 premium just to get the 128GB model. In fact, I would go on to say that you should be buying this particular model compared to the 32GB variant. I just don’t like that the company is gouging you another $100 ($429 in total) just to get one.
The 8th generation iPad is disappointing in a lot of ways and its only redeeming quality is its new processor. It would have been nice if there is a redesign or that the lightning cable is changed to USB-C, but there is just not a lot of things to talk about here.
Therefore, I should say that the 8th generation iPad is just an iterative upgrade. Whether you want to buy it or not is entirely up to you.
Amazon Echo Studio Review- The Bigger ‘Echo’ Speaker That Competes
Amazon, the biggest online retailer in the world, has created its own AI implementation in the form of the Amazon Alexa.
It is actually quite polished and it can go against Apple’s Siri and Google’s own AI. That being said, the company has released some ‘Echo’ speakers that not only act as Bluetooth audio devices but as smart devices as well.
Today, I am going to be reviewing the Amazon Echo Studio. Does this thing really have what it takes to compete with the others?
One of the biggest criticisms of Amazon’s Echo speakers of the past is that although its smart features are okay, their sound output leaves much to be desired. As a way of addressing the issue, Amazon has built the Echo Studio.
The Amazon Echo Studio is pretty big. It is 8 inches in height and 7 inches wide so this is indeed a pretty hefty audio solution. In fact, I would go on to say that this is one of the biggest Bluetooth speakers on the market.
Its design is pretty much akin to the Amazon Echo speakers of old. You get a fabric mesh design that encapsulates the speaker itself with all of its button controls situated at the top of the device.
You also get a blue ring light that will pretty much add to the aesthetic appeal of the unit. The microphone is also placed at the top and it is always on ‘listening mode’ so that whenever you want to interact with Alexa, it can do so at a moment’s notice.
Although you cannot see it, the Amazon Echo Studio is actually powered by a subwoofer, a tweeter, and four mid-range speakers that are mounted at the top and the sides. This thing is a beast as it can output 330 watts of power when needed, which is ample enough even for home cinema setups.
The Amazon Echo Studio is quite a powerful Bluetooth speaker. No matter what genre of content you’d like to consume, this thing can output the necessary sound to make your viewing experience more immersive.
I am usually keen on an audio solution’s performance when it comes to playing music and I am happy with the Echo Studio’s prowess.
Although it favors the lower frequencies more than the mids and the highs, it does so without drowning the latter two, which is something that you normally do not see on large Bluetooth speakers.
An interesting feature that the Amazon Echo Studio has is its support for 3D Audio. You will need to sign in to your Amazon Music HD account before you can get a hold of this feature and it is the only platform that supports the Echo Studio’s 3D Audio. Amazon did mention that it will hand out support for other streaming platforms at a later date though.
So, how is the speaker’s performance on that front? Well, I am not really sure what to think about it as I have mixed feelings about the said feature.
3D audio is meant to provide a more immersive listening experience but I can hardly tell the difference between traditional Hi-Res audio and this one.
I guess you could say that for tracks that have a more melodic tone that you can discern a 3D audio-enabled track from a regular track, but other than that, non-audiophiles can hardly tell the difference.
To be fair, the said feature is still not polished yet, so expect it to improve in the years to come.
The Amazon Echo Studio also has seamless integration with the Amazon Fire TV Stick, though it does support all other streaming services like Netflix and Hulu as well.
You are also given the option to link up another Amazon Echo Studio speaker so that you can have them work in tandem to provide you with even better sound. I do not have a second unit though, so I cannot really tell anything about this. But, the feature is there if you want to get another unit.
Aside from 3D audio, the Echo Studio also acts as a control hub for your smart devices. You can use Alexa to turn off your lights at a specific time of the night or you can have it play your favorite track if you want. The possibilities are endless.
Do keep in mind that while it should support most of the smart home devices that you can buy on the market, there are some products that do not play ball.
For instance, some smart locks can only be supported using Apple’s Siri, so you cannot control that using this device.
You can also link up a second Echo Studio speaker if you have one and you can use both of them to provide you with an even more powerful and more immersive listening experience.
You can control the speaker’s features by manually tapping on the buttons at the top of the device or by downloading its companion app.
Amazon has finally solved the issue of the Amazon Echo speakers of the past by giving you a relatively large speaker that can do a lot of things.
The Amazon Echo Studio has support for 3D audio, but you will need to have an Amazon Music HD account to get a hold of the said feature.
You can also use the speaker to control your smart home devices which is pretty nice. The microphone is always on listening mode so that you can call Alexa’s attention at a moment’s notice.
Normally, I would expect a product like this to cost more than $300, but the Amazon Echo Studio actually costs just $199. I guess getting another one is not too far out of the equation, eh?
Google Nest Audio vs Amazon Echo- The Battle of the New ‘Smart’ Speakers
Best Tech Deals in October 2020
Best Laptop Deals in October 2020
Amazon Luna- Everything You Need to Know About Amazon’s Cloud Gaming Service
Apple iPad 8th Generation Review- An Iterative Upgrade
Product6 months ago
LumiGuard Ultra-Bright Wireless Floodlight Review- Keep Intruders Away
Product7 months ago
Oshen Watch Luxe Review : Price, Features, Top Smartwatch for 2020
Product5 months ago
The TVFix Has Major Electronics Corporations Sweating!
Product7 months ago
Kaydia Pain Patch Review : Does It Really Work?
Product6 months ago
EBulb Review- The Only Emergency Power LED Light You’ll Ever Need
Product7 months ago
TV Buddy Review 2020- The Best Caster for Your TV
Gaming6 months ago
ExitLag VPN Review- Does It Really Improve Your Ping and Reduce Lag?
TV7 months ago
TV Buddy Caster Reviews : Pros and Cons