The Google Pixel 4 is a flagship device and when you take it as it is, then there should be no comparison with the more budget-friendly Google Pixel 4a, right? Well, that is not as easy as you think.
Sure, the bigger pixel device does have a lot going for it, but it doesn’t mean that it provides better value.
So, which one is better? Read my analysis of the Google Pixel 4 and Pixel 4a ahead to find out.
First things first, let’s start with the design. The Google Pixel 4 measures 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches while the Pixel 4a measures 5.7 x 2.7 x 0.3 inches. As you can see, they are somewhat identical, albeit the older pixel device is a bit bigger.
The appearance of the phones is a little bit different as well, especially when you look at the display.
You see, the Pixel 4 has a huge notch at the top to house the needed Soli chip and other sensors for the phone’s essential features. While the Pixel 4a has a much bigger screen-to-body ratio- allowing you to enjoy more of the content that you are consuming.
It is also safe to say that the Pixel 4a looks more modern because of the slimmer bezels as well.
It is also worth noting that the Google Pixel 4a comes with a headphone jack. This is a good thing, especially for people that want to use their own favorite headphones.
As for build quality, the flagship Pixel 4 has a glass back and aluminum chassis while the cheaper Pixel 4a has a polycarbonate body.
Even though the cheaper model is made of plastic, it is sturdy plastic which means that there will be no issues when it comes to longevity as the phone can take a beating.
Lastly, only the flagship pixel phone has an IP68 rating, so if you opt for the 4a, you should not subject it to any water or droplets to protect the device.
As mentioned earlier, the budget Google Pixel 4a provides more screen real estate thanks to the exclusion of a notch, slimmer bezels, and only a punch-hole camera at the top left of the phone.
The Google Pixel 4, however, not only has a gigantic notch, but the said notch can really take away a lot of space. You could get used to it, but at first glance, it is definitely noticeable.
The flagship pixel has a 5.7-inch OLED display with a resolution of 2280 x 1080 and has a screen refresh rate of 90Hz. The budget offering has a 5.81-inch OLED panel with 2340 x 1080 resolution and 60Hz refresh rate.
While the 90Hz screen refresh rate is noticeable, most of the games on the Play Store only support 60Hz anyway, so this shouldn’t be a huge deal, at least, for the time being.
It is also worth mentioning that the Pixel 4a has more horizontal pixels than the Pixel 4, though this is mostly negligible in real-world use.
Google’s own smartphones have been touted to be the best when it comes to mobile phone cameras and both the premium Google Pixel 4 and the more budget Google Pixel 4a offer unparalleled performance on that front.
Let’s start with the hardware. The Google Pixel 4 has two cameras at the back; one 12-megapixel main sensor and a 16-megapixel telephoto lens. That’s right, it doesn’t have an ultra-wide lens compared to the iPhone 11.
The Google Pixel 4a only has a 12.2-megapixel camera lens at the back along with an LED flash that helps with nighttime photography.
Both of these devices have the same 8-megapixel front-facing camera which is great in most applications, especially when you are looking to go on a video conference call.
With the company’s computational photography magic, as well as better integration with the hardware, both the Google Pixel devices perform exceptionally well when capturing photos and videos.
It is important to note that while the Pixel 4 has a 16-megapixel telephoto lens, you are only getting 2x optical zoom which may not prove to be useful in some situations. It would have been more useful had the company stuck with an ultra-wide sensor, but I digress.
The more budget Pixel 4a does come with all of the features that are present in its flagship counterpart except for the Super Res Zoom function that allows you to zoom in on a subject without adding distortions or graininess in the resulting image.
Both of the phones have support for Google’s astrophotography which is essentially a mode that you can enable when you are in pitch-black environments.
Speaking of darker environments, I am surprised that both performed admirably well when it comes to low-light photography. I do have to stress that enabling Night Mode certainly helps in such situations.
You also get the same 8-megapixel front camera on both of these devices, so performance is the same when it comes to the selfie shooter.
Specs and Performance
Google Pixel 4
- CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
- GPU: Adreno 640
- Display: 5.7-inch OLED, 2280 x 1080 resolution, 19.9:9 aspect ratio, 90Hz refresh rate, Corning Gorilla Glass 5
- RAM: 6GB
- Storage: 64GB/128GB
- Cameras: 12-megapixel main sensor (f/1.7), 16-megapixel telephoto lens (f/2.4); 8-megapixel front camera
- Battery: 2,800 mAh, 18-watt charger included, wireless charging enabled
- Software: Android 10
- Colors: Just Black, Clearly White, Oh So Orange
Google Pixel 4a
- CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
- GPU: Adreno 618
- Display: 5.81-inch OLED, 2340 x 1080 resolution, 19.5:9 aspect ratio, Gorilla Glass 3
- RAM: 6GB
- Storage: 128GB
- Cameras: 12.2-megapixel (f/1.7) OIS + EIS; 8-megapixel selfie camera
- Battery: 3140 mAh, 18-watt charger included, no wireless charging
- Software: Android 10
- Colors: Just Black
In terms of raw performance, the flagship Google Pixel 4 is much better. Couple that with a high refresh rate screen and you have a fairly competitive gaming phone.
This is not to say that the Pixel 4a is a slouch. In fact, its mid-range performance package should be good enough to handle all the tasks that you throw at it, though you will feel some slow-downs when playing graphically demanding games.
I should point out that none of these devices support 5G connectivity, which is a bummer for people that want a future-proof smartphone.
Some Google representatives did mention that they are going to release a 5G version of the Pixel 4a, though that will be some time in the future. By then, other competitive 5G phones will be released, making the 5G version of the Pixel 4a obsolete.
Both of the phones do come with 6GB of RAM, though the flagship pixel provides you with more storage options compared to its more budget counterpart.
Google had to cut corners to help keep the Pixel 4a priced lower than other phones on the market. Aside from its polycarbonate body, Google also had to remove the charging coils that would have made this device Qi Wireless charging capable, but alas, it doesn’t.
The Google Pixel 4, however, has the charging coils, as well as the glass back that are needed for wireless charging to work, so if you want a more convenient way to top up your device, you might think of getting the more premium smartphone.
Now, despite the Pixel 4 being capable of wireless charging, I do have to point out that because of its lower battery capacity, you will only be getting around 5-7 hours of use depending on the applications you intend to run.
The Pixel 4a lasts longer and it should be enough to last a single day on a full charge. Even though it is not capable of charging wirelessly, you do have an 18-watt charger included in the box.
So, it is decision time. Which device provides a much better value: The flagship Google Pixel 4 or the budget Google Pixel 4a? To be honest, you are better off with the Google Pixel 4a.
The reason why I recommend the more budget offering is that aside from its competitive price of $350, you are getting a pretty good mid-range device that has the right specs. It may not have wireless charging and 5G connectivity, but for the most part, it ticks the right boxes.
The flagship Google Pixel 4, while there are some features that you may like such as the faster screen refresh rate, wireless charging, and the inclusion of a telephoto lens, its battery life leaves much to be desired and when you compare it to other flagship devices, it definitely ranks lower than the others on the market.
Both of the said devices do have 3-year software support which means that you not only have the ability to install Android 11 when it comes out but it can also support at least up to Android 14 or 15.
So there you have it! Get the Google Pixel 4a as it is considered as one of the best mid-range phones in the market.
Google Nest Audio vs Amazon Echo- The Battle of the New ‘Smart’ Speakers
Smart home speakers are not as popular as mobile phones, but in my opinion, it actually should be.
You see, companies are slowly rolling out smart home devices so that your life will be so much easier given the convenience of having them.
That being said, I am going to be talking about the Google Nest Audio and Amazon Echo speakers because they are the ones that are at the forefront when it comes to smart home speakers. Which of these should you choose? Read on to find out!
For those of you who do not know, Google Nest Audio is actually the Google Home speakers that were released just about a year ago. It seems that Google wanted to use a new moniker to denote that this particular thing can ‘nest’ your other smart home devices.
The Amazon Echo, on the other hand, refers to the medium-sized Bluetooth speaker that the largest online retailer sells. The company is set to release a new version of this device soon, so it would be interesting to see how well it performs.
Even though the new version of the Amazon Echo hasn’t arrived at our doorstep yet for an official review, this is not to say that we can somehow speculate what it can offer, especially considering that the company has provided us with some really good information about it.
With all of those out of the way, let’s talk more about the design first. The Google Nest Audio takes on a more cylindrical approach in that the speaker itself has a higher height than the Amazon Echo.
For that reason, you are getting a 75mm woofer and a single 19mm tweeter. Google touts the Google Nest Audio as a better sound solution compared to its original Google Home Speaker because of the changes.
On the other hand, the Amazon Echo, in my opinion, has better sound quality. That is thanks to its two 20mm tweeters and a huge 76.2mm woofer. Its design is more spherical but I am pleased (and surprised) that Amazon was able to include two tweeters on its Bluetooth speaker implementation.
At the base of the Amazon Echo is a blue light ring that changes the way it emits light depending on the current usage.
Both of these Bluetooth speakers are offered in various colors so you have different options to choose from.
If you look at the design of both speakers, you could make a case that the Amazon Echo wins this round when it comes to pure sound quality. Its two tweeters compared to the single tweeter on the Google Nest Audio, provides it with a much better chance of delivering mid-high sound frequencies.
This is not to discount the fact that Google has some tricks up its sleeves because its AI technology is smart enough to adjust the sound quality on the fly when needed.
Both of the speakers have an adaptive sound feature wherein if it detects that the ambient noise is loud enough, it increases the volume of whatever content you are consuming at that moment to compensate. This is using both of the speakers’ microphones. The volume should normalize to the last known level after it detects that the ambient sound has quieted down.
Of course, this is only my opinion after looking at the spec sheet because I will have to get my hands on these things before I can give my honest opinion. But, my initial assessment would be that the Amazon Echo delivers better sound compared to the Google Nest Audio.
To be able to provide you with ‘smart’ features, both the Google Nest Audio and Amazon Echo are equipped with processors that can handle just that.
The Google Nest Audio comes with the company’s TeraOPS A53 processor which is a quad-core chip that boasts of better performance compared to the company’s previous Bluetooth speakers.
On the other hand, Amazon’s own speaker is equipped with the AZ1 Neural Edge processor that, according to the company, should be more responsive to voice commands compared to previous versions.
It is hard to say who wins this round. You see, Amazon has Zigbee hub integration which means that your connected smart home devices have better compatibility with the said speaker because of this.
However, we all know that Google’s AI technology is so advanced (and even more accurate) than Alexa, so it could potentially provide you with better features overall compared to Amazon’s Bluetooth speaker.
Of course, I cannot truly say which one wins this round until I get to review these wireless audio solutions. In that case, stay tuned for more.
The Google Nest Audio will be available on October 5, while the Amazon Echo will not be released until later this month (October 22). That being said, both of these speakers will retail for $99.99, so stay tuned for our official product reviews to help you know which one you should ultimately choose for yourself.
Apple iPad 8th Generation Review- An Iterative Upgrade
When it comes to ease of use and convenience, people like getting Apple’s products because of its more streamlined approach to everything. Sure, there is a lot to tinker on Android but that is also precisely the reason why the user experience, at least for the layman, is not as great.
There is this saying that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Well, although I would have liked to say that here, I just don’t think that that approach applies here.
You see, the design of the 8th generation iPad is identical to its predecessor. As in everything about its aesthetics are similar which means that if you want to imagine what the new iPad looks like, all you have to do is look at the 7th gen variant.
Like all things, it can be a good thing or a bad thing. It is a good thing because that familiar design should feel right at home, especially for people that already own an iPad. It is bad because, in this day and age, more and more mobile devices have slimmer bezels and the new iPad still has those atrociously huge ones.
Don’t get me wrong, there are practical uses to having large bezels as it allows you to hold the tablet better when using it in landscape mode, but if you are watching online content, you can’t help but be bothered by the huge sides.
There are two versions of the 8th generation iPad and that is one with WiFi only and the other one having LTE. Its dimensions are 9.8 x 6.8 x 0.29. The only difference between the WiFi and the LTE versions is that the latter is a bit heavier at 495 grams compared to the 490 grams of the former.
Thankfully, Apple didn’t remove the headphone jack but if you are going to utilize its built-in speakers, you are better off using a good Bluetooth speaker instead.
The 8th generation iPad has a 10.2-inch Retina Display with a resolution of 2160 x 1620 and 264 pixels per inch or PPI. It has a good peak brightness at 500 nits, though you can still experience some problems when you are outside and the sun is shining brightly.
You can utilize the Apple Pencil on this device and it is also quite accurate as well (just keep in mind that it is sold separately).
What I love about iPads, in general, is that their displays provide you with crisp and clear details. Whether you are working on your documents or perhaps watching your favorite movies and TV shows, they do not disappoint.
Specs and Performance
- CPU: A12 Bionic
- GPU: Apple GPU (4-core graphics)
- RAM: 3GB
- Storage: 32GB/128GB
- Display: 10.2-inch Retina IPS LCD Display, 2160 x 1620, 4:3 aspect ratio, 500 nits brightness, 264 PPI
- OS: iPadOS 14
- Cameras: 8-megapixel (back), 1.2-megapixel (front)
- Connectivity: WiFi 802.11 AC, Bluetooth 4.2
- Battery: 32.4 Wh
So, if the 8th generation iPad has an identical design to its predecessor, what has changed here? Well, I am glad you asked. The only notable difference here is that the new model comes with the A12 Bionic chip and that’s pretty much it.
While you could be unhappy with the change, the new CPU actually beats its predecessor by a lot. By using Geekbench 5, single-core scores are about 60% higher than the 7th gen iPad and about 100% better in multi-core tasks than the previous model.
Granted that the said benchmark is relatively old, you couldn’t argue that the new processor is indeed way better than its predecessor.
Even when you are just using the tablet the way it should be used, you can really tell the difference. This is more evident if you are going to play some games.
Now, do not worry about the 3GB of RAM because the iOS ecosystem is quite streamlined and efficient that you normally wouldn’t need more than that.
It should also go without saying that the included cameras are just there for show and they do not really do anything special, so I don’t think that covering them is warranted here.
Sure, the new 8th generation iPad doesn’t bring a lot to the table, but its new processor is leaps and bounds better than its predecessor. Does that justify buying the new one? Probably not, especially if you already own the 7th generation model.
However, if you own an older iPad and you want better performance across the board, then you could probably spend your money to get one.
My gripe here is that there are only two storage options to choose from. You can get the 32GB variant for only $329 but in this day and age, 32GB is not a lot of storage space.
If you want more storage, you will need to spend an additional $100 premium just to get the 128GB model. In fact, I would go on to say that you should be buying this particular model compared to the 32GB variant. I just don’t like that the company is gouging you another $100 ($429 in total) just to get one.
The 8th generation iPad is disappointing in a lot of ways and its only redeeming quality is its new processor. It would have been nice if there is a redesign or that the lightning cable is changed to USB-C, but there is just not a lot of things to talk about here.
Therefore, I should say that the 8th generation iPad is just an iterative upgrade. Whether you want to buy it or not is entirely up to you.
Amazon Echo Studio Review- The Bigger ‘Echo’ Speaker That Competes
Amazon, the biggest online retailer in the world, has created its own AI implementation in the form of the Amazon Alexa.
It is actually quite polished and it can go against Apple’s Siri and Google’s own AI. That being said, the company has released some ‘Echo’ speakers that not only act as Bluetooth audio devices but as smart devices as well.
Today, I am going to be reviewing the Amazon Echo Studio. Does this thing really have what it takes to compete with the others?
One of the biggest criticisms of Amazon’s Echo speakers of the past is that although its smart features are okay, their sound output leaves much to be desired. As a way of addressing the issue, Amazon has built the Echo Studio.
The Amazon Echo Studio is pretty big. It is 8 inches in height and 7 inches wide so this is indeed a pretty hefty audio solution. In fact, I would go on to say that this is one of the biggest Bluetooth speakers on the market.
Its design is pretty much akin to the Amazon Echo speakers of old. You get a fabric mesh design that encapsulates the speaker itself with all of its button controls situated at the top of the device.
You also get a blue ring light that will pretty much add to the aesthetic appeal of the unit. The microphone is also placed at the top and it is always on ‘listening mode’ so that whenever you want to interact with Alexa, it can do so at a moment’s notice.
Although you cannot see it, the Amazon Echo Studio is actually powered by a subwoofer, a tweeter, and four mid-range speakers that are mounted at the top and the sides. This thing is a beast as it can output 330 watts of power when needed, which is ample enough even for home cinema setups.
The Amazon Echo Studio is quite a powerful Bluetooth speaker. No matter what genre of content you’d like to consume, this thing can output the necessary sound to make your viewing experience more immersive.
I am usually keen on an audio solution’s performance when it comes to playing music and I am happy with the Echo Studio’s prowess.
Although it favors the lower frequencies more than the mids and the highs, it does so without drowning the latter two, which is something that you normally do not see on large Bluetooth speakers.
An interesting feature that the Amazon Echo Studio has is its support for 3D Audio. You will need to sign in to your Amazon Music HD account before you can get a hold of this feature and it is the only platform that supports the Echo Studio’s 3D Audio. Amazon did mention that it will hand out support for other streaming platforms at a later date though.
So, how is the speaker’s performance on that front? Well, I am not really sure what to think about it as I have mixed feelings about the said feature.
3D audio is meant to provide a more immersive listening experience but I can hardly tell the difference between traditional Hi-Res audio and this one.
I guess you could say that for tracks that have a more melodic tone that you can discern a 3D audio-enabled track from a regular track, but other than that, non-audiophiles can hardly tell the difference.
To be fair, the said feature is still not polished yet, so expect it to improve in the years to come.
The Amazon Echo Studio also has seamless integration with the Amazon Fire TV Stick, though it does support all other streaming services like Netflix and Hulu as well.
You are also given the option to link up another Amazon Echo Studio speaker so that you can have them work in tandem to provide you with even better sound. I do not have a second unit though, so I cannot really tell anything about this. But, the feature is there if you want to get another unit.
Aside from 3D audio, the Echo Studio also acts as a control hub for your smart devices. You can use Alexa to turn off your lights at a specific time of the night or you can have it play your favorite track if you want. The possibilities are endless.
Do keep in mind that while it should support most of the smart home devices that you can buy on the market, there are some products that do not play ball.
For instance, some smart locks can only be supported using Apple’s Siri, so you cannot control that using this device.
You can also link up a second Echo Studio speaker if you have one and you can use both of them to provide you with an even more powerful and more immersive listening experience.
You can control the speaker’s features by manually tapping on the buttons at the top of the device or by downloading its companion app.
Amazon has finally solved the issue of the Amazon Echo speakers of the past by giving you a relatively large speaker that can do a lot of things.
The Amazon Echo Studio has support for 3D audio, but you will need to have an Amazon Music HD account to get a hold of the said feature.
You can also use the speaker to control your smart home devices which is pretty nice. The microphone is always on listening mode so that you can call Alexa’s attention at a moment’s notice.
Normally, I would expect a product like this to cost more than $300, but the Amazon Echo Studio actually costs just $199. I guess getting another one is not too far out of the equation, eh?
Google Nest Audio vs Amazon Echo- The Battle of the New ‘Smart’ Speakers
Best Tech Deals in October 2020
Best Laptop Deals in October 2020
Amazon Luna- Everything You Need to Know About Amazon’s Cloud Gaming Service
Apple iPad 8th Generation Review- An Iterative Upgrade
Gaming1 year ago
ExitLag VPN Review- Does It Really Improve Your Ping and Reduce Lag?
Product1 year ago
LumiGuard Ultra-Bright Wireless Floodlight Review- Keep Intruders Away
Product11 months ago
The TVFix Has Major Electronics Corporations Sweating!
Product1 year ago
EBulb Review- The Only Emergency Power LED Light You’ll Ever Need
Product1 year ago
Oshen Watch Luxe Review : Price, Features, Top Smartwatch for 2020
News1 year ago
Beidou Network Rivals GPS- China Set to Compete in Global Navigation
Laptop11 months ago
The Best and Worst Laptop Brands in 2020- Companies That You Should Trust and Those That You Should Avoid
Product1 year ago
Kaydia Pain Patch Review : Does It Really Work?