17-inch gaming laptops aren’t as popular as a 15-inch portable gaming machine, but these are the types of portables that allow you to cram flagship components into.
The Razer Blade 17 Pro 2020 edition has one compelling feature and that is its 300Hz display. But, does it have what it takes to compete in the 17-inch gaming laptop segment?
When it comes to design, you can always rely on Razer to bring you a laptop with impeccable aesthetics. On the surface, you will see a slab of aluminum with a matte black finish, but despite its metal chassis, it is actually quite lightweight at only 2.4 kilos (5.29lbs). That is pretty impressive for a 17-inch portable gaming machine.
You will see the familiar tri-headed snake logo on the lid which actually adds to the aesthetic appeal. This is also quite a nice branding scheme so you can flaunt this laptop in public.
On the right, you will find one USB-A port, a USB-C port, an SD card reader, and an HDMI port. On the left side, you will find two additional USB-A ports, coupled with a 2.5GHz Ethernet port, a headphone/microphone combo jack, and the proprietary power connector.
Since this is a new machine, you also get the Intel AX201 WiFi chip inside which means that it uses the new WiFi 6 standard. You will need an AX router for that to work, though.
When you open the lid, you will find that the keyboard doesn’t have a Numpad, but instead, it has the two speakers on either side of the chassis to provide you with relatively nice sound output. It doesn’t have enough bass, but for the most part, it should be adequate for gaming.
Once opening the laptop, the machine will be propped up a little bit to make room for the built-in fans to suck air in. The air vents at the back of the chassis spew hot air out, though you will find later in the review that it doesn’t perform as well as I’d hoped.
Now, if you are going to buy the Razer Blade 17 Pro, you will have multiple configurations to choose from. The review unit that I have has a flagship graphics processor, a 10th generation Intel Core CPU, and a whopping 300Hz refresh rate display. You can get a 4K touch panel with a 120Hz screen refresh rate, though that would cost you a whole lot more.
Anyway, the one that I have comes with a 1080p, 300Hz screen refresh rate display. For pure gaming, this is actually a pretty good screen.
I do have to point out that you have to be a bonafide gamer to be able to tell the difference between a 144Hz display and a 300Hz screen. For most people, this is mostly unnoticeable.
It is sad that Razer didn’t equip this laptop with an OLED panel, but instead, you are getting an IPS display which should still be adequate for most use-cases.
It did score 110% on the sRGB color test which also makes this ideal for creative workloads as well.
The 17.3-inch IPS panel, although adequate for most use-cases, does present some noticeable glare when you are situated in a well-lit room. You may have to find the right position so that you won’t suffer from heavy glare that might diminish your overall experience when using the laptop.
Keyboard and Trackpad
I used to love Razer’s gaming laptops due to their amazing keyboards, but the Razer Blade 17 Pro is a bit different from the usual.
It still has that chiclet design but its shallower travel makes it a bit cumbersome to type on (given that I have large fingers).
When doing a typing test, I get an average of 103 WPM instead of my usual 110 WPM which I attribute to the shallow travel distance of each keypress.
Your mileage may vary of course because you might like the feel of each key, but for me, I just didn’t like it at all (at least, when compared to the previous models).
It does have that per-key RGB lighting which you can customize using the Razer Synapse software (which is built into the laptop).
As for the trackpad, I actually love the glass trackpad that is on this thing. It makes it easier to glide the mouse across the screen and, for the most part, it is quite responsive as well.
Because of the nature of the material, expect that the trackpad can become a fingerprint magnet. It isn’t too huge of a deal since one wipe of the trackpad should remove any smudges.
Specs and Performance
- CPU: Intel Core i7-10875H
- GPU: Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- RAM: 16GB DDR4-2933
- Storage: 512GB PCIe NVME SSD
- Display: 17.3-inch IPS, 1920 x 1080 resolution, 300Hz screen refresh rate
- Connectivity: Bluetooth 5.1, WiFi 6
- Ports: 1x USB 3.2 Type-C, 3x USB 3.2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x 2.5GHz Ethernet Port, 1x 3.5mm headphone/microphone combo jack
- Camera: 720p
- Battery: 70.5 Whr
- Weight: 5.29 lbs
As mentioned earlier, you can get multiple configurations of the Razer Blade 17 Pro, but the one that I have is the tier just below the high-end model. Keep in mind that the version that I have only had the 1080p, 300Hz screen refresh rate, which means that you can opt to get the 4K, 120Hz version if you want (though it will cost you $3,900).
Anyway, when it comes to specs, the Razer Blade 17 Pro performs admirably well. It is able to play even the most demanding games at more than 144 frames per second, so you can truly utilize the 1080p screen to its full extent.
Despite the fact that this configuration only comes with 512GB NVMe SSD, you can add another NVMe SSD as there is an empty slot at the back that you can use.
In terms of productivity tasks, the laptop can handle things really well, although it does suffer a bit of a performance hit when it comes to multi-core workloads as it is beaten by laptops that are equipped with the new Ryzen mobile processors.
I do have to point out that when you are using the highest settings in your favorite games that the laptop can get really hot to the touch. In my testing, it reached a whopping 45 degrees celsius when gaming after 30 minutes, so do bear this in mind.
In some rare cases, the laptop did throttle when it comes to full rendering workloads, but since most people who buy the Razer Blade 17 Pro will most likely just play games anyway, this shouldn’t be too much of an issue.
This gaming laptop did relatively well in my battery torture tests. I was able to get 4 hours and 31 minutes of full use before I reached for the charger and for a 17-inch laptop that has power-hungry components, that is really impressive.
I just did not like the proprietary charger because in the event that it breaks or if you’ve lost it somehow, you will need to buy a new one directly from the company which may take time before it reaches your doorstep.
I’ve also noticed that when you plug this machine in the wall socket while playing games, you get considerably higher performance than not having it plugged in, though I wouldn’t recommend this because it can dramatically lessen the battery life of this thing.
The Razer Blade 17 Pro is a pretty competitive gaming laptop. Its 300Hz screen refresh rate is definitely something that pro gamers will surely love. Of course, you can opt for a 4K touch display if you have the money to spend, but in most cases, the 1080p screen is perfectly fine for most users.
Although it runs hotter than other gaming laptops out there, the Blade 17 Pro is still a beastly portable gaming machine.
My configuration costs $3,200 so it is definitely not cheap, but if you are looking for a competitive 17-inch gaming laptop, this is something to consider.
Amazon Luna- Everything You Need to Know About Amazon’s Cloud Gaming Service
It seems that cloud gaming is the future as a lot of companies are pooling their resources just to make things happen.
Amazon Luna is Amazon’s foray into cloud gaming and it is going to be available soon. Read further to find out more information about this new experience.
Google has paved the way for cloud gaming to come to the fore with the release of the Stadia not too long ago. Although it was mired with a lot of different issues, it seems that the company has found a way to make things work.
Amazon also wants in on the action and although there are some similarities with Luna and Stadia, there are also some stark differences as well.
Before I begin, I just want to explain the concept of cloud gaming. Basically, instead of downloading games to your gaming PC or whatever platform you choose to install them, you will just stream those games using data centers that are scattered all over the world.
It should go without saying that you need to have a fast internet connection to make this happen and so that you will not experience high latency (which was a huge problem when Stadia launched).
That being said, the premise of Google Stadia is that you need to either purchase an individual game so that you can play it at any time (forever) or you could subscribe to the monthly plan and play the games that are on offer every month (and continue to play them so long as you’re subscribed).
With Amazon Luna, you will be presented with different channels that you can subscribe to. Each of these channels has different games on offer which makes this quite appealing for game developers to show their mettle.
Right now, the platform is still in beta and there are only two channels available at the moment- Amazon’s own Luna Plus and the Ubisoft Channel. The latter will have 50 games that you can play right away and more Ubisoft games will be added in the future.
Keep in mind that this channel-based system makes it so that developers can price their services accordingly. It remains to be seen how much Ubisoft will charge individual users, so stay tuned for that.
1080p and 4K Gaming
Just like Google Stadia, Amazon Luna will support both 1080p and 4K resolutions. Of course, the latter would be more taxing and you will need a fast internet connection to be able to enjoy high-fidelity gaming. I suggest that you get a WiFi 6 router and a compatible device to make the most out of your experience.
Unlike Stadia, Amazon Luna is more flexible in that it supports a lot of different devices. Not only can you play on your PC, but you can also choose to play it using your iOS devices, Android phones, and you can even utilize the company’s own FireTV devices as well.
Now, there has been this entire debacle about Apple’s 30% cut on every app in its App store but the good news is that Amazon can circumvent that.
You see, when you are going to play on your iOS devices, the application will actually be a PWA or a Progressive Web App. Basically, the game that you want to play will run in a contained web browser instead of it being an actual application that you install in your device. This bypasses the whole 30% cut issue which is a good thing.
NVIDIA Hardware Use
According to a recent Steam survey, the vast majority of PC users are all using NVIDIA graphics cards. This is a good thing for Amazon Luna because it means that it can support a lot more people.
That is because the company’s cloud gaming service will use NVIDIA GPUs instead of AMD cards (which Stadia uses for graphics processing).
Supposing that Amazon Luna will be more popular than any other cloud gaming service out there, NVIDIA will enjoy huge profits as a result.
Can Be Streamed to Popular Sites
Twitch is arguably the most popular streaming platform today and Amazon is looking to forge a partnership with the said service to allow you to stream your games to the popular website.
The said platform is widely used as a means of generating revenue- something that is quite popular today due to the recent pandemic.
This move also makes it appealing as well as more and more content creators can use Amazon Luna to reach a broader audience.
New Controller with Alexa Support
Just like Google Stadia, Amazon Luna also requires you to get a special controller. The good thing is that the control will have a microphone so that you can use Alexa for specific voice commands.
What’s interesting about the Luna’s controller is that it is completely connected to the Cloud, which means that you do not have to pair it with the specific device you are going to use to play games online.
According to Amazon’s website, it should have a grippy texture and will feature low-friction thumbsticks that provide maximum performance across the board. By using the controller’s microphone, you can actually tell Alexa to fire up the specific game that you want to play, so long as it is inside the channel that you’ve subscribed to.
Amazon Luna is quite enticing, at least, on paper. It is shaping up to be a better cloud gaming service compared to its competitors but the service is still in beta, so there are more things that need ironing out before its official release.
Right now, there are only two channels that are available and Ubisoft hasn’t imposed its pricing yet. The Amazon Luna channel is priced at $6.99
If you are interested in getting in on the action, you can be an early beta tester by subscribing to the service.
Amazon Luna will be out sometime in October.
Acer Nitro XV340CK Review- A Greatly Competitive Ultrawide Gaming Monitor Under $500
Ultrawide monitors used to be a niche display in that the only people who work on productivity tasks and creative workloads usually buy them.
Fortunately, the display technology has evolved and gamers, too, can enjoy a much wider screen.
Today, I am going to review the Acer Nitro XV340CK which is a 34-inch ultrawide gaming monitor that is priced competitively.
Even though this is marketed as a gaming monitor, the Acer Nitro XV340CK actually doesn’t look like it. It looks simple and I love the aesthetics, especially if you want to place this in your office.
The only thing that might make you think that this is a gaming display is that red accent that you can find on the base of the monitor but that’s about it.
Anyway, let’s start with the stand. Aside from the aforementioned red accent, the stand provides good ergonomics.
It gives you the ability to swivel the monitor a complete 360 degrees, you can tilt it to 35 degrees back and you can adjust the height up to 5.9 inches. Because this is an ultrawide monitor, you cannot put this thing in portrait mode.
I love the fact that this monitor has slim bezels. At only 0.4 inches, you can place another monitor right beside it and it wouldn’t really take a lot of screen real estate at all.
The overall build quality is good. Despite the fact that it doesn’t feel premium, at least when compared to the best gaming monitors out there, it still feels sturdy nevertheless.
For the ports, you get two Displayport 1.4 ports, two HDMI 2.0 ports, and two USB 3.0 ports. Due to the wealth of ports on offer, you can use this for your PC or your game console.
The only thing that might be cumbersome for some users is that the OSD controls are situated at the back of the monitor- particularly on the bottom right side. The buttons are also a bit smaller than usual, so you may have a hard time pressing the right ones.
The Acer Nitro XV340CK has a 34-inch IPS display with a resolution of 3440 x 1440 and an aspect ratio of 21:9. It is the same as other ultrawide gaming monitors that you can find on the market so there is no problem with that.
You do have the option to enable the picture-in-picture mode so that you can divide the display in two if you wish to fire up two different programs at the same time. This is why it is not only a handy gaming monitor, but it can also be used for office work as well.
Its contrast and brightness leave much to be desired. With a native contrast ratio of 1048:1 and peak SDR brightness of only 247 nits, it is not the best display when it comes to these things.
However, its redeeming quality is that its colors are accurate. After calibration, I got 95% sRGB, 82% AdobeRGB, and 81% DCI-P3. It is relatively color accurate and it would have been nice for creative workloads, but its peak brightness just falls short of making it an ideal display for such use-cases.
It is also worth noting that if you are in a well-lit room that the brightness could be a huge issue. The good thing is that the display’s matte finish can help reduce glare significantly, though you will still find that it is not bright enough in some situations.
I am surprised by the fact that there is literally no color bleed on the Acer Nitro XV340CK. This is unheard of, especially since ultrawide monitors are notorious for this.
Sure, its peak brightness and contrast could have improved, but gamers are not especially focused on those things. If anything, it is the performance of the display that usually takes the cake and I am happy to report that you won’t be disappointed with the Nitro XV340CK.
Normally, with IPS panels, they tend to not have a good response time, but that is actually not the case here. At just 5.3ms, it is definitely one of the best out there even when compared to other, more premium models.
How about input lag? This is a speed monitor and as expected, input lag is minimal. At just 4.2ms, I am really blown away by the performance of this thing. Every keypress on your gaming keyboard will register almost immediately and that is really great from a competitive standpoint.
It is also worth noting that its 144Hz refresh rate is ideal, especially since most gamers are clamoring for high refresh rate displays anyway.
This is a FreeSync gaming monitor and you can enable this variable refresh rate feature in both AMD and Nvidia graphics cards.
To get a hold of the said features, it is important for you to know that you should use the DisplayPort cable that is included in the box. There is also an included HDMI cable if you want to use this display for your Xbox or Playstation consoles.
With all of those things being said, if I were to ask you how much this thing costs, what will be your guess? If you’ve guessed around $700, you’re wrong.
The Acer Nitro XV340CK is priced at just $450! At that price, you are getting a relatively color-accurate monitor, a really fast display with minimal input lag, and a vast number of ports that you can use for your PC or game consoles.
Sure, its contrast and peak brightness could have been improved, but if you are talking about raw gaming performance, the Acer Nitro XV340CK blows other ultrawide gaming monitors out of the way.
Just make sure that you have a nice gaming PC for this thing to work nicely. Other than that, I highly recommend the Acer Nitro XV340CK for its price and performance.
HyperX Cloud Stinger S- A Comfortable 7.1 Surround Sound Gaming Headset
As an audiophile, I’ve always loved HyperX’s gaming audio solution. They are inexpensive and for the price, you are actually getting sound quality that you normally would only hear from expensive products.
In today’s article, I am going to review the HyperX Cloud Stinger S. This is a budget offering that aims to improve upon the original Cloud Stinger with the inclusion of a 7.1 surround sound option.
Do I recommend this headset? Find out later on in the article.
The HyperX Cloud Stinger S is actually quite similar to the original version. It has the same pleather ear cups that envelope your ears quite nicely and the clamping force of the headset itself is actually quite okay.
I’ve been receiving reports that there are some people that have problems with the tightness or, shall I say, how loose this thing can be. But that will probably be a result of the size of your head and not the actual product itself. For me, the fit was okay, but your mileage may vary.
Although this thing is predominantly made in plastic, the overall build quality is good, though I would advise you not to throw this headset when you lose a round in a MOBA game or first-person shooter.
There is a microphone on this headset and just like the original, it is not removable. It would have been nice if you could remove it when you are not using it because even if you fold the microphone (which also acts as a way of muting it), you will still see it which can be annoying at times.
This thing is quite simple and all you have for the controls is the volume slider that is located on the right ear cup.
While other HyperX gaming headsets come with a carrying pouch, I am sad to say that the HyperX Cloud Stinger S doesn’t have one.
All you get in the box aside from the headset is a USB dongle that is attached to a relatively long cable and some documentation. And, since you use this thing completely wired, it can also be used in your Playstation or other game consoles as well.
The 3.5mm analog cable should be inserted in the USB dongle if you wish to use its 7.1 surround sound implementation, but if you are just going to watch movies or play non-competitive games, I suggest that you do not use it.
There are two modes that you can utilize if you are going to use the HyperX Cloud Stinger S. You can use its 3.5mm headphone jack and enjoy stereo sound or you could insert that into the included USB dongle and use the 7.1 surround sound feature.
Keep in mind that if you are going to use the 7.1 output that it is only supported on the PC since you will need the NGENUITY software to enable it.
That being said, the HyperX Cloud Stinger S’ sound signature leans more toward being bright and with a little emphasis on the bass. This seems to be the preference of the majority of gamers since lower frequencies can make those in-game sounds pop-out more.
I also love the mid frequencies as it is quite balanced as well. I’ve had no problems listening to in-game dialog and when I am using the microphone, it just works really well.
Although the high frequencies are okay, I would say that it is the weakest of the bunch, though not so much as to diminish the overall sound quality. You will still hear the sibilance of the cymbals and lead guitars, but it is not as pronounced as the lower and mid frequencies.
As for the 7.1 surround sound, you should enable it in the companion software and it is only available when you are on the PC.
Anyway, its surround sound is okay but I say this because it is a budget gaming headset. If you compare it to the more premium ones, this is subpar at best. Still, you could enable it in your favorite games but I will advise against it if you are just listening to music or watching movies.
Despite a relatively good clamping force, the HyperX Cloud Stinger S doesn’t do so well in terms of sound isolation. People around me can still hear what I was listening to, so this might not be ideal if you are playing at night and there are people sleeping.
There is usually this notion that budget headsets have horrible microphones but not the HyperX Cloud Stinger S. In fact, I would go on to say that it has one of the better ones on the market.
Instead of sounding tinny, the microphone quality of the Cloud Stinger S is full-bodied and my teammates can hear every word I said without any problems.
The volume of the microphone is also quite good as well. Normally, with budget offerings, you tend to sound a bit ‘too far’ but that is not the case here.
Overall, I am quite pleased with the microphone. The only thing that I do not like is that the flippable microphone may impede your vision sometimes, but I think that you can adjust to this.
For a budget headset, the HyperX Cloud Stinger S is definitely one of the better sounding ones. I also love the fact that the microphone’s quality is top-notch and it can even go head-to-head against its more premium counterparts.
I am just a bit disappointed that you do not get a carrying pouch with this one because other HyperX gaming headsets have them. But, this is a minor inconvenience.
I did not feel the need to talk about the NGENUITY software mainly because it is pretty barebones and all you can do with it is to enable the 7.1 surround sound, adjust the volume and microphone, and that’s about it. There is no equalizer present which is quite odd.
Still, for what it is giving you, the HyperX Cloud Stinger S is highly recommended. This thing costs $60.
Google Nest Audio vs Amazon Echo- The Battle of the New ‘Smart’ Speakers
Best Tech Deals in October 2020
Best Laptop Deals in October 2020
Amazon Luna- Everything You Need to Know About Amazon’s Cloud Gaming Service
Apple iPad 8th Generation Review- An Iterative Upgrade
Gaming1 year ago
ExitLag VPN Review- Does It Really Improve Your Ping and Reduce Lag?
Product1 year ago
EBulb Review- The Only Emergency Power LED Light You’ll Ever Need
Product1 year ago
The TVFix Has Major Electronics Corporations Sweating!
Product1 year ago
LumiGuard Ultra-Bright Wireless Floodlight Review- Keep Intruders Away
News1 year ago
Beidou Network Rivals GPS- China Set to Compete in Global Navigation
Product1 year ago
Oshen Watch Luxe Review : Price, Features, Top Smartwatch for 2020
Laptop1 year ago
The Best and Worst Laptop Brands in 2020- Companies That You Should Trust and Those That You Should Avoid
Product1 year ago
Kaydia Pain Patch Review : Does It Really Work?